Human-animal relationship during surgical clinical procedure and postoperative calf Holstein Black and White stricken by anal atresia: Case Report
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22256/pubvet.v12n3a59.1-9%20Keywords:
anorectal anomaly, welfare, bovine, surgery, congenital malformationAbstract
This relate tells the objective of describing human-animal relation during clinical-surgical treatment and postoperative treatment in Holstein calf treated by anal atresia and its possible effects on well-being and gaining weight. Anal atresia is a congenital malformation with occlusions in the challenge and anus that occurs in animals and in human. The well-being of animals afflicted by pain and suffering in the postoperative can be influenced by the human-animal relationship. The animal was born in 2016 and after 48 hours, it was found atresia anal grau II, suggestive of pain and suffering. Emergency surgery was performed such as sedation, local anesthesia and epidural. The evaluation of the welfare was performed by clinical, behavioral, and physiological and weight gain hair. In the postoperative antibiotic, anti-inflammatory and polyvitamins were administered. After surgery, elimination of gases and mechanics was observed, following normal evacuations until discharge. The surgical wound showed good conditions; however, the feces presented blood strains, fibrin and rectal tense. The animal normalized the appetite and appeared active and how vigorous at the end of the surgery, explored the environment and used the soft bed at moments of rest and vocalize before breastfeeding. Chopped hay and ration were available, which favored an alteration in the consistency of the feces, going from semipastosa to pasture. In the postoperative, human-animal interaction was established, where it was possible to observe positive accounts such as dropping out, dropping fingers, scratching humans, demonstrating playful behaviors such as persecutions, acrobatics, jump-in, running, manipulations as targets, air and head. The physiological indicators were normalized. The weight gain was 11 kg in 25 days. It is concluded that during the first 30 days, the surgical and operative clinical treatment the animal presented a good clinical evolution and that humanitarian care as "positive" actions in the human-animal relationship influenced the welfare and gain of weight.
References
Almeida, P. A., Oliveira, J. R. & Mantovani, M. M. 2010. Determinantes da interação homem-animal. PUBVET, 4, 144.
ANUALPEC. 2017. Anuário da Pecuária Brasileira, 20th edn. Instituto FNP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Boivin, X., Le Neindre, P., Chupin, J. M., Garel, J. P. & Trillat, G. 1992a. Influence of breed and early management on ease of handling and open-field behaviour of cattle. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 32, 313-323.
Boivin, X., Neindre, P. L. & Chupin, J. M. 1992b. Establishment of cattle-human relationships. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 32, 325-335.
Bond, G., B., Almeida, R., Ostrensky, A. & Molento, C. F. M. 2012. Métodos e pontos críticos de bem-estar de bovinos leiteiros. Ciência Rural, 42, 1286-1293.
Carvalho, Y. N. T., Branco, M. A. C., Mota, H. C. M., Evangelista, L. S. M., Silva, S. V. & Feitosa Júnior, F. S. 2012. Atresia anal associada à fístula reto-vaginal em bezerra: uma revisão. PUBVET, 6, 1-6.
Dawkins, M. S. 2017. Animal welfare and efficient farming: is conflict inevitable? Animal Production Science, 57, 201-208.
Duncan, I. J. H. 2005. Sciense-based assessment of animal welfare: farm animals. Revue Scientific et Technique Office et International des Epizooties, 2, 483-492.
Faraco, C. B. & Seminotti, N. 2004. A relação homem-animal e a prática veterinária. Revista CFMV, 10, 57-62.
Gonçalves, R. C. & Barioni, G. 2000. Exame clínico do aparelho respiratório de bezerros. Revista de Educação Continuada do CRMV-SP, 3, 4-13.
Hemsworth, P. H. 2003. Human–animal interactions in livestock production. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 81, 185-198.
Hemsworth, P. H., Price, E. O. & Borgwardt, R. 1996. Behavioural responses of domestic pigs and cattle to humans and novel stimuli. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 50, 43-56.
Honorato, L. A., Hötzel, M. J., Gomes, C. C. M., Silveira, I. D. B. & Machado-Filho, L. C. P. 2012. Particularidade relevante da interação humana-animal para o bem-estar e produtividade de vacas leiteiras. Ciência Rural, 42, 332-339.
Jago, J. G., Krohn, C. C. & Matthews, L. R. 1999. The influence of feeding and handling on the development of the human–animal interactions in young cattle. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 62, 137-151.
Lensink, B., Fernandez, X., Boivin, X., Pradel, P., Le Neindre, P. & Veissier, I. 2000. The impact of gentle contacts on ease of handling, welfare, and growth of calves and on quality of veal meat. Journal of Animal Science, 78, 1219-1226.
Lensink, B. J., Raussi, S., Boivin, X., Pyykkönen, M. & Veissier, I. 2001a. Reactions of calves to handling depend on housing condition and previous experience with humans. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 70, 187-199.
Lensink, B. J., Veissier, I. & Florand, L. 2001b. The farmer’s influence on calves’ behaviour, health and production of a veal unit. Animal Science, 72, 105-117.
Llonch, P., King, E. M., Clarke, K. A., Downes, J. M. & Green, L. E. 2015. A systematic review of animal based indicators of sheep welfare on farm, at market and during transport, and qualitative appraisal of their validity and feasibility for use in UK abattoirs. The Veterinary Journal, 206, 289-297.
Molento, C. F. M. 2005. Bem-estar e produção animal: Aspectos econômicos - Revisão. Archives of Veterinary Science, 10, 1-11.
Passillé, A. M., Rushen, J. & Martin, F. 1995. Interpreting the behaviour of calves in an open-field test: a factor analysis. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 45, 201-213.
Pinheiro, A. A. & Brito, F. I. 2009. Bem-estar e produção animal. EMBRAPA, Sobral.
Rizzo, H., Jesus, H. J., Ribeiro, R. M., Mero, H. C., Souza, C. H. R., Rocha, F. A. B., Moreira Neto, J. T. M., Santos, L. A., A., Santana, T. O., Guimarães, V. A. A. & Guimarães, M. A. 2011. Tratamento clínico cirúrgico de atresia anal em bezerro. Veterinária e Zootecnia, 18, 478-481.
Rushen, J., Passillé, A. M. B. & Munksgaard, L. 1999. Fear of people by cows and effects on milk yield, behavior and heart rate at milking. Journal of Dairy Science, 82, 720-727.
Schütz, K. E., Cox, N. R., Macdonald, K. A., Roche, J. R., Verkerk, G. A., Rogers, A. R., Tucker, C. B., Matthews, L. R., Meier, S. & Webster, J. R. 2013. Behavioral and physiological effects of a short-term feed restriction in lactating dairy cattle with different body condition scores at calving. Journal of Dairy Science, 96, 4465-4476.
Steiner, A. 2004. Surgery of the colon. In: Fubini, S. & Ducharme, N. (eds.) Farm animal surgery. Elservier Sounders, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.
Tenório, L., A., Araújo Filho, W. F. & Normande Filho, H. V. 1996. Atresia retal. Jornal de Pediatria, 72, 181-183.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Jackson do Amaral, Guilherme Trevisan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Você tem o direito de:
Compartilhar — copiar e redistribuir o material em qualquer suporte ou formato
Adaptar — remixar, transformar, e criar a partir do material para qualquer fim, mesmo que comercial.
O licenciante não pode revogar estes direitos desde que você respeite os termos da licença. De acordo com os termos seguintes:
Atribuição
— Você deve dar o crédito apropriado, prover um link para a licença e indicar se mudanças foram feitas. Você deve fazê-lo em qualquer circunstância razoável, mas de nenhuma maneira que sugira que o licenciante apoia você ou o seu uso. Sem restrições adicionais
— Você não pode aplicar termos jurídicos ou medidas de caráter tecnológico que restrinjam legalmente outros de fazerem algo que a licença permita.