A domesticação e sua influência na criação e bem-estar de hamsters: Revisão
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31533/pubvet.v17n03a1358Palavras-chave:
Ambiente, cativeiro, comportamento, roedoresResumo
Um animal é considerado saudável quando se encontra em um estado de bem-estar biopsicossocial. A domesticação e a forma de criação influenciam de maneira significativa na vida dos animais, determinando aspectos comportamentais e fisiológicos. Hamsters costumam ser criados em gaiolas, que são ambientes muito reduzidos em relação ao que esses roedores costumam viver quando livres na natureza. O objetivo do presente trabalho foi avaliar as mudanças que ocorreram em hamsters devido a domesticação e, conforme isso, determinar qual é a melhor condição de criação para que esses animais vivam em bem-estar.
Referências
Albright, J. & De Matos, R. (2010). Hamsters. In: Tynes, V. V. Behavior of exotic pets. United Kingdom: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Cap. 12.
Almeida, P. A., Oliveira, J. R., & Mantovani, M. M. (2010). Determinantes da interação homem-animal. PUBVET, 4(4), 144.
Arnold, C. E. & Estep, D. Q. (1994). Laboratory caging preferences in golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus). Laboratory Animals, 28(3), 232-238. https://doi.org/10.1258/002367794780681598
Bantin, G. C. & Sanders, P. D. (1989). Animal caging: is big necessarily better? Animal technology, journal of the Institute of Animal Technology, 40, 45-54.
Baker, A. (1994). Variation in the parental care systems of mammals and the impact on zoo breeding programs. Zoo Biology, 13(5), 413–421. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.1430130504.
Boitiani, L. & Cuicci, T. (1995). Comparative social ecology of feral dogs and wolves. Ethology, ecology and Evolution. 7: 49-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.1995.9522969.
Clark, M. M. & Galef, B.G. (1977). The role of the physical rearing environment in the domestication of the mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus). Animal behavior, 25, 298-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472%2877%2990006-9.
Clark, J. D. (1987). Historical perspectives and taxonomy. In: Van Hoosier, G. L., Mcpherson, C. W. Laboratory Hamsters. Orlando: Academic Press, p. 3-4.
Dantzer, R., & Mormède, P. (1985). Stress in domestic animals: a psychoneuroendocrine approach. In Animal Stress (pp. 81–95). Springer.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7544-6_6.
Dawkins, M. S. Animal Suffering. The Science of Animal Welfare. Chapman & Hall, New York, 1980. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5905-7.
Ebinger, P. (1995). Domestication and plasticity in brain organization in mallards (Anas platyrhynchos). Brain, behavior and Evolution. 45(5), 286-300. https://doi.org/10.1159/000113557
Fischer, K., Gebhardt-Henrich, S. G. & Steiger, A. (2007). Behaviour of golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) kept in four different cage sizes. Animal welfare. 16: 85-93. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0962728600030967.
Driscoll, C. A., Macdonald, D. W. & O’Brien, S. J. (2009). From wild animals to domestic pets, an evolutionary view of domestication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(supp 1), 9971–9978. https://doi.org/10.17226/12692.
Galibert, F., Quignon, P., Hitte, C., & André, C. (2011). Toward understanding dog evolutionary and domestication history. Comptes Rendus Biologies, 334(3), 190–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2010.12.011.
Gattermann, R., Fritzsche, P., Neumann, K., Al-Hussein, I., Kayser, A., Abiadand, M., & Yakti, R. (2001). Notes on the current distribution and the ecology of wild golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus). Journal of Zoology, 254(3), 359–365. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952836901000851.
Hansen, S. W. & Damgaard, B. (1991). Effect of environmental stress and immobilization on stress physiological variables in farmed mink. Behavioral Processes, 25(2-3), 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-6357(91)90021-q.
Hauzenberger, A. R., Gebhardt-Henrich, S.G. & Steiger, A. (2006). A influência da profundidade da cama no comportamento de hamsters dourados (Mesocricetus auratus). Applied Animal Behavior Science,100 (3-4), 280-294.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2005.11.012.
Hediger, H. (1964). Wild Animals in Captivity. New York: Dover.
Huck, U. W., Price, E. O. (1976). Effect of the post-weaning environment on the climbing behaviour of wild and domestic Norway rats. Animal Behavior, 24(2), 364–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-3472(76)80044-9
Jepson, L. (2009). Clínica de animais exóticos: referência rápida. Clínica de Animais Exóticos, 7(753), 73.
Kittel, R. (1986). The Golden Hamster. Lutherstadt Wittenberg: Westarp Wissenschaften.
Kruska, D. (1988). Mammalian domestication and its effect on brain structure and behavior. Pp. 211–250 in HJ Jerison and I Jerison (eds.) Intelligence and Evolutionary Biology. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70877-0_13
Kruska, D. (1996). The effect of domestication on brain size and composition in the mink (Mustela vison). London: Journal of zoology. 239: 645-661. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1996.tb05468.x
Kruska, D. C. T. (2005). On the evolutionary significance of encephalization in some eutherian mammals: Effects of adaptive radiation, domestication, and feralization. Brain Behavior Evolution, 65, 73-108. https://doi.org/10.1159/000082979
Kuhnen, G. (1999). The effect of cage size and enrichment on core temperature and febrile response of Golden hamster. Laboratory Animal, 33(3), 221-227. https://doi.org/10.1258/002367799780578246
Lanteigne, M. & Reebs, S. G. (2006). Preference for bedding material in Syrian hamsters. Laboratory Animal, 40(4), 410-418. https://doi.org/10.1258/002367706778476424
Marsden, C. D., Ortega-Del Vecchyo, D., O’Brien, D. P., Taylor, J. F., Ramirez, O., Vilà, C., Marques-Bonet, T., Schnabel, R. D., Wayne, R. K., & Lohmueller, K. E. (2016). Bottlenecks and selective sweeps during domestication have increased deleterious genetic variation in dogs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(1), 152–157. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1512501113.
Mellor, D. J. (2016). Updating animal welfare thinking: Moving beyond the “Five Freedoms” towards “a Life Worth Living.” Animals, 6(3), 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani6030021
Murphy, M. R. (1985). History of the capture and domestication of the Syrian golden hamster (Mesocricetus auratus). Pp. 3–20. In: SIEGEL, H. The Hamster: Reproduction and Behavior. New York, NY: Plenum. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0815-8_1
Nusshag, W. M. de A., & Romero, J. (1980). Compendio de anatomía y fisiología de los animales domésticos (Issue 636.0892 N8C6). Acribia.
Passineau, M. J., Green, E. J. & Dietrich, W. D. (2001). Therapeutic effects of environmental enrichment on cognitive function and tissue integrity following severe traumatic brain injury in rats. Experimental Neurology. 168(2), 373-384. https://doi.org/10.1006/exnr.2000.7623
Price, E. O. (1984). Behavioral aspects of animal domestication. Quarterly Review of Biology, 59: 1 – 32. https://doi.org/10.1086/413673
Price, E. O. & Wallach, S. J. R. (1990). Physical isolation of hand-reared Hereford bulls increases their aggressiveness toward humans. Applied Animal Behavior Science. 27(3), 263–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(90)90061-h
Price, E. O. (1999). Behavioral development in animals undergoing domestication. Applied animal behaviour Science, 65(3), 245-171.https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-1591(99)00087-8
Price, E. O. (2002). Animal Domestication and Behavior. Wallingford: CABI Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851995977.0010.
Prusky, G. T., Reidel, C. & Douglas, R. M. (2000). Environmental enrichment from birth enhances visual acuity but not place learning in mice. Behavioral Brain Research. 114(1-2), 11-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-4328(00)00186-8
Puurunen, K. & Sivenius, J. (2002). Influence of enriched environment on spatial learning following cerebral insult. Reviews in neurosciences. 13(4), 347-364. https://doi.org/10.1515/revneuro.2002.13.4.347
Richards, M. P. M. (1966). Activity measured by running wheels and observation during the oestrous cycle, pregnancy and pseudo-pregnancy in the golden hamster. Animal Behavior, 14(4), 303-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-3472(66)80044-1
Röhrs, V. M. (1985). Cephalization, neocorticalization and effects of domestication on brain in mammals. 23(4), 544-547. In: Duncker, H. R. & Fleicher, G. (eds). Functional morphology in vertebrates. Stuttgart: G Fischer, https://doi.org/10.1016/0041-0101(85)90196-5.
Silva, M. A., & Kuhnen, T. A. (2015). Direitos e cuidado para a proteção da autonomia prática de animais não humanos. Revista Internacional Interdisciplinar, 12(1), 42–64. https://doi.org/10.5007/1807-1384.2015v12n1p42.
Simon, P.; Dupuis, R.; Costentin, J. (1994). Thigmotaxis as na index of anxiety in mice. Influence of dopaminergic transmissions. Behavirol Brain Research, 61, 59-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4328(94)90008-6
Sousa, M. R. Q., & Silva, F. B. S. (2012). Interação homem-animal e sua relação com a guarda responsável de cães em um bairro da cidade do Recife-PE. PUBVET, 6(5), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.22256/pubvet.v16n5.1294.
Teixeira, V. N. (2014). Rodentia - Roedores exóticos (rato, camundongo, hamster, gerbilo, porquinho-da-índia e chinchila). In: Cubas, Z. S.; Silva, J. C. R.; Catão-Dias, J. L. Tratado de animais selvagens. São Paulo: Roca, cap. 55, 2ª ed.
Veissier, I., & Boissy, A. (2007). Stress and welfare: Two complementary concepts that are intrinsically related to the animal’s point of view. Physiology & Behavior, 92(3), 429–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.11.008.
Werther, K. (2022). Semiologia de animais selvagens. In: Feitosa, F. L. Semiologia veterinária: a arte do diagnóstico. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan LTDA., cap. 16, 4ª ed..
Wood-Gush, D. G. M. & Vestergaard, K. (1989). Exploratory behavior and the welfare of intensively kept animals. Journal Agriculture and Ethics, 2, 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01826929
Zeder, M. A. (2012). Pathways to animal domestication. Biodiversity in Agriculture: Domestication, Evolution, and Sustainability, 227–259. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139019514.013
Zhang, Y., Colli, L., & Barker, J. S. F. (2020). Asian water buffalo: domestication, history and genetics. Animal Genetics, 51(2), 177–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/age.12911.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2023 Simone Furini Sulzbach, Giovanna Akemi Tanaka, Aires Santana Rumpel
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Você tem o direito de:
Compartilhar — copiar e redistribuir o material em qualquer suporte ou formato
Adaptar — remixar, transformar, e criar a partir do material para qualquer fim, mesmo que comercial.
O licenciante não pode revogar estes direitos desde que você respeite os termos da licença. De acordo com os termos seguintes:
Atribuição
— Você deve dar o crédito apropriado, prover um link para a licença e indicar se mudanças foram feitas. Você deve fazê-lo em qualquer circunstância razoável, mas de nenhuma maneira que sugira que o licenciante apoia você ou o seu uso. Sem restrições adicionais
— Você não pode aplicar termos jurídicos ou medidas de caráter tecnológico que restrinjam legalmente outros de fazerem algo que a licença permita.
