Perception of students about a low cost model for training ovariosalpingohisterectomy in small animals

Authors

  • Natalia Kano Universidade Federal do Paraná
  • Flávia Carolina Meira Collere Universidade Federal do Paraná
  • Letícia Fernanda Laube Universidade Federal do Paraná
  • Simone Tostes de Oliveira Stedile Universidade Federal do Paraná
  • Roberta Carareto Universidade Federal do Paraná

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22256/pubvet.v12n5a83.1-8

Keywords:

alternative methods, cat, dog, teaching, veterinary surgery

Abstract

In Veterinary Education, non-harmful alternatives methods have been explored in order to replace the use of animals as a teaching resource. The objective of this study was to analyze the students' opinion regarding the use of a low cost model for training ovariaosalpingohisterectomy in small animals before in vivo performance. There were 21 veterinary medicine students from a Veterinary Surgical Teaching class enrolled in the study. They underwent training in the model before performing the surgery on the animal and then answered a questionnaire regarding the use of the model, including team organization, emotional safety and technique training. Among the students, 95.2% considered that the training improved the flow of tasks, 85.7% felt safer in performing the surgery on the live animal after training with the model and 76.2% considered that the training resulted in an improvement in the surgical ability to perform the surgery. There was also a 23.2% decrease (32 minutes) in surgical time in the live animal, compared to the previous year's group without training in the model. The use of the model had positive results, because besides being well accepted by the students, it brought greater confidence and technical skill during the surgery, reducing the time of the procedure.

Published

2018-04-30

Issue

Section

Medicina veterinária

How to Cite

Perception of students about a low cost model for training ovariosalpingohisterectomy in small animals. (2018). Pubvet, 12(05). https://doi.org/10.22256/pubvet.v12n5a83.1-8

Most read articles by the same author(s)